User talk:Mike Peel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to my talk page. Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page, use headlines when starting new talk topics and sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. I will generally reply on this page to keep conversations together; please watch this page for a short time after leaving a comment. Uncivil comments will be reverted without response. Thank you.

Start a new talk topic.

If you would prefer to contact me off-wiki, then my contact details and a contact form are available on my personal website.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:12, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 203.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:12, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 206.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:12, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 207.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, but the filename would be better.--Tournasol7 06:11, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 248.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, but the filename would be better.--Tournasol7 06:11, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 196.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Phyrexian 10:17, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RHS Garden Bridgewater 2022 051.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:03, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Faro de Tostón 2022 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:12, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At São Paulo 2023 097.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:06, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Foxfield Light Railway 2024 121.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:06, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! UFCG, Sousa 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GiovanniPen 09:29, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2024 368.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Елена Нечипоренко 12:27, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ruislip Lido 2024 057.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 14:14, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:41, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Shugborough 2024 021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 10:00, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ruislip Lido 2024 045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:41, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RHS Garden Bridgewater 2022 052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 08:17, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Didcot Railway Centre 2024 070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --Peulle 07:22, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Shugborough 2024 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tanvir Rahat 05:53, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 198.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 19:48, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 203.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:09, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello can you add a cat of the station where you took File:At Tokyo 2024 270.jpg? Thank you--Tmv (talk) 14:39, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tmv: Done, thanks for the prod. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 15:40, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:36, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:36, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes missing (2024-10)

[edit]

To revisit User_talk:Mike_Peel/Archive_21#Infoboxes (from 2024-09), as I noticed that "query 2" is ever so popular (Special:Contributions/Pi_bot), maybe it's possible to improve it further by using Wikimedia Superset to find sitelinks to Commons at Wikidata, but unknown to Commons (at quarry). We would just need to find somebody with the right skills and access.
 ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 08:39, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]